Floristics and physical structure of five Amazon plots in Ecuador and Peru

Randall Myster

doi:10.53157/ecotropicos.34e0020

Authors

Randall Myster Oklahoma State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53157/ecotropicos.34e0020

Keywords:

Igapó, palm, terra firme, várzea, white sand

Abstract

The Amazon contains some of the most important forested ecosystems on earth and so we need to know the nature and degree of their similarities and differences. Therefore I compared the floristics and physical structure of five common Amazonian forest-types (terra firme, palm and white sand [all unflooded], várzea and igapó [both flooded]) with data from separate one ha plots in the Ecuadorean and Peruvian Amazon. I found (1) the most abundant families were Arecaceae, Fabaceae, and Clusiaceae and those families along with Euphorbiaceae were the only families found in all five plots, (2) the highest stem density, the greatest number of large stems and the most closed canopy were in várzea and terra firme, (3) palm had the most median stems and the smallest average stem size, and (4) igapó had the smallest basal area and above-ground biomass. Ordination on the five plots then suggested that Arecaceae and Clusiaceae best defined the floristic data, and total stems and smallest stem size class best defined the physical structure data. Cluster analysis after ordination (1) based on floristics, showed that terra firme, várzea and igapó formed a cluster and both palm and white sand were in separate clusters by themselves, and (2) based on physical structure, showed that terra firme and palm formed a cluster, white sand and igapó formed a cluster and várzea was in a cluster by itself. While results suggest that soil characteristics are important in determining the floristic composition of Amazon forests and flooding characteristics are important in determining their physical structure, they can only set-up hypotheses to test by future sampling of these forest-types elsewhere in the Amazon

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buchholz T, Tennigkeit T & Weinreich A.2004. Maesopsis eminii - a challenging timber tree species in Uganda - a production model for commercial forestry and smallholders. Proceedings of the international union of forestry research organizations (IUFRO) conference on the economics and management of high productivity plantations p.15

Choo J, Martinez R & Stiles E.2002. Diversity and abundance of plants with flowers and fruits from October 2001 to September 2002 in Paucarillo Reserve, Northeastern Amazon, Peru. Revisita Peru Biology14: 25–31.

Daly D & Prance G.1989. Brazillian Amazon. In: Campbell D & Hammond H(Eds.) Floristic inventory of tropical countries, NY Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, pp. 401–426.

Duivenvoorden J, Balslev H, Caveilier J, Grandez C, TuomistoH & Valencia R. 2001. Evaluacion de recursos vegetales nomaderables en la Amazonia Noroccidental. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Fine P, Garcia-Villacorta R, Pitman N, Mesones I & KembelS.2010. A floristic study of the white-sand forests of Peru. Annual Missouri Botanical Garden97: 283-305. https://doi.org/10.3417/2008068

Fine P & Kembel S. 2011. Phylogenetic community structure and phylogenetic turnover across space and edaphic gradients in western Amazonian tree communities. Ecography 34: 552-565 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06548.x

Gentry AH.1996.A Field Guide to the Families and Genera of Woody Plants of Northwest South America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Gottdenker N & Bodmer RE.1998. Reproduction and productivity of white-lipped and collared peccaries in the Peruvian Amazon.Journal of Zoology, London 245: 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283699800805X

Honorio EN.2006.Floristic relationships of the tree flora of Jenaro Herrera, an unusual Area of the Peruvian Amazon. Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Junk WJ, Bayley PB & Sparks RE.1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems.Canadian Special Publications Fish and Aquatic Science106: 110-127.

Kalliola RS, Jukka M, Puhakkaa M & Rajasilta M.1991. Newsite formation and colonizing vegetation in primary succession on the western Amazon floodplains. Journal of Ecology 79:877-901. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261087

Legendre P & Gallagher ED.2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data.Oecologia129:271-280 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100716

Ludwig JA & Reynolds JF.1988.Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Malhi Y, Phillips OL, Lloyd J, Baker T, Wright J, Almeida S,Arroyo L, Frederiksen T, Grace J, Higuchi Net al.2002.An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forests (RAINFOR). Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02068.x

Minchin, P.R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. In: Prentice, I.C., van der Maarel, E. (eds) Theory and models in vegetation science. Advances in vegetation science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4061-1_9

Moreau CS. 2008. Unraveling the evolutionary history of the hyper-diverse ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Molecular Physical Evolution48: 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.020

Myster RW. 2009. Plant communities of Western Amazonia. The Botanical Review75: 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-009-9032-1

Myster RW.2012a. How does the precipitation gradient interact with common disturbances to structure prairies? Journal of Plant Interactions 7: 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2011.571796

Myster RW. 2012b. A refined methodology for defining plant communities using data after Sugarcane, Banana and pasture cultivation in the Neotropics. The Scientific World Journal 2012: 365409. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/365409

Myster RW. 2013. The effects of flooding on forest floristics and physical structure in the Amazon: results from two permanent plots. Forest research 2: 112. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9776.1000112

Myster RW. 2015. Várzea forest vs. terra firme forest floristics and physical structure in the Ecuadorean Amazon. Ecotropica 20: 35-44.

Myster RW. 2016a. Black-water forests (igapó) vs. white-water forests (várzea) in the Amazon: floristics and physical structure. The Biologist (Lima) 13: 391-406.

Myster RW. 2016b. Forest structure, function and dynamics in Western Amazonia. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119090670

Myster RW. 2016c. The physical structure of Amazon forests: a review. The Botanical Review 82: 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-016-9174-x

Myster RW. 2017a. A comparison of the forest soils in the Peruvian Amazon: Terra firme, palm, white sand and igapó. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 8: 130-134. https://doi.org/10.5897/JSSEM2017.0644

Myster RW.2017b. Introduction. En: Myster RW (Ed.) Forest structure, function and dynamics in Western Amazonia, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119090670.ch1

Myster RW.2018a. Effects of soil type on floristics and stand structure in Amazon unflooded forests.Journal of Plant Studies 7: 20-28. https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v7n2p20

Myster RW.2018b.Igapó (Black-water flooded forests) of the Amazon Basin. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90122-0

Myster RW.2018c. What we know about the composition and structure of igapó forests in the Amazon Basin.The Botanical Review 84: 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-018-9204-y

Myster RW.2019. Primary and secondary igapó in the Peruvian Amazon: floristics, physical structure and the predicative value of soil bulk density. Journal of Plant Studies 8: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v8n1p20

Myster RW.2021. Effects of selective-logging, litter and tree species on forests in the Peruvian Amazon: seed predation,seed pathogens, germination.New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 59: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33494/nzjfs512021x153x

Myster RW & Malahy MP.2008. Is there a middle way between permanent plots and chronosequences? Canadian Journal of Research 38: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-148

Myster RW & McCarthy BC.1989. Effects of herbivory and competition on survival of Carya tomentosa (Juglandaceae) seedlings.OIKOS 56: 145-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565329

Nascimento HEM & Laurance WF.2002. Total aboveground biomass in central Amazonian rainforests: a landscape-scale study.Forest Ecology and Management168: 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00749-6

Peacock J, Baker TR, Lewis SL, Lopez-Gonzalez G & Phillips OL.2007. The RAINFOR database: monitoring forest biomass and dynamics.Journal of Vegetation Science18: 535-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02568.x

Pielou EC.1991.The interpretation of ecological data: a primer on classification and ordination. John Wiley & sons, NY.

Pitman NC, Mogollon H, Davila N, Rios M, Garcia-Villacorta R, Guevara J, Baker TR, Monteagudo A, Phillips OL,Vasquez-Martinez Ret al. 2008. Tree community change across 700 km of lowland Amazonian forest from the Andean foothills to Brazil. Biotropica 40: 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00424.x

Pitman NC, Terborgh JW, Silman MR, Nunez PV, Neill DA,Ceron C, Palacios WA & Aulestia MC.2001. Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firmeforests. Ecology 82: 2101-2117. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2101:DADOTS]2.0.CO;2

Romoleroux K, Foster R, Valencia R, Condit R, Balslev H & Losos E.1997. Especies lenosas (dap => 1 cm) encontradas en dos hectareas de un bosque de La Amazonia ecuatoriana. En:Estudios Sobre Diversidad y Ecologia de Plantas, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, pp. 189-215.

SAS.1985.SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

Stropp J, Ter Steege H & Malhi Y.2009. Disentangling regional and local tree diversity in the Amazon. Ecography 32: 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05811.x

Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K & Yli-Halla M.2003. Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of Western Amazonian forests.Science 299: 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078037

Umana MN, Nordan N, Cano A & Stevenson PR. 2010. Determinants of Plant Community Assembly in a Mosaic of Landscape Units in Central Amazonia: Ecological and Phylogenetic Perspectives.PLOS One7: e45199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045199

Vormisto J, Svenning JC, Hall P & Balslev H.2004. Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaeae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin. Journal of Ecology 92:577-588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00904.x

Wilson JB.1991. Does vegetation science exist? Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 289-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.1991.tb01131.x

Wittmann F, Junk WJ & Schongart J.2010. Phytogeography, species diversity, community structure and dynamics of central Amazonian floodplain forest. En: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Parolin P, Wittman F & Schongart J(Eds.) Amazonian Floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Ecological Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8725-6_4